What is a good ThruPlay rate for Meta video ads in 2026?

A good ThruPlay rate for Meta video ads in 2026 is 18-28%. ThruPlay measures views that reach either 15 seconds or completion (whichever comes first). This benchmark varies by audience type, with retargeting audiences typically achieving 30-50% higher rates than cold prospecting campaigns.

What hook rate should I target for Facebook video ads?

Target a minimum hook rate of 25% for Facebook video ads in 2026. Hook rate is calculated as 3-second video plays divided by impressions. Top-performing ecommerce creatives achieve 30-35% hook rates. Any creative with a hook rate below 15% should be killed immediately as it indicates complete failure to stop the scroll.

What is a healthy hold rate for Meta video ads?

A healthy hold rate for Meta video ads is 20-25%. Hold rate is calculated as ThruPlays divided by 3-second video plays, measuring whether viewers who stopped scrolling actually stayed to consume your message. Hold rates below 15% indicate your video content fails to deliver on the hook promise.

How do hook rate and hold rate differ?

Hook rate measures scroll-stopping power (3-second views ÷ impressions) while hold rate measures content quality (ThruPlays ÷ 3-second views). Hook rate determines if people notice your ad; hold rate determines if they engage meaningfully. Both metrics are crucial for Meta video ad optimization.

How long do Meta video ads maintain performance before fatigue?

Meta video ads typically maintain peak performance for 5-14 days at high spend before experiencing ad fatigue. Performance decline is indicated by decreasing hook rates, rising CPMs, and dropping ROAS. Successful campaigns require regular creative refresh cycles to maintain benchmark performance levels.

What factors affect Meta video ad benchmark performance?

Key factors include audience type (cold vs retargeting), video length (under 15s vs 30s+), placement (Reels vs Feed), and creative quality. Retargeting audiences achieve 30-50% higher rates. Reels placement typically shows 5-10 percentage points better hold rates than Feed placement.

Ira Bodnar·June 4, 2026·14 min read

Meta video ad benchmarks: ThruPlay, hook and hold rate 2026

The definitive benchmarks for Hook Rate (25%+), Hold Rate (20-25%), and ThruPlay (18-28%) based on analysis of 500M+ Meta video ad impressions across e-commerce, SaaS, and lead generation campaigns.

Built by our community of 2,000 marketers

Free skills and prompts for paid ads and SEO

Templates for Claude, ChatGPT and Perplexity.

Clients we work withClients we
work with

Meta video ads that hook viewers in the first 3 seconds drive 40% lower cost per acquisition.

But knowing your Hook Rate beats 25% means nothing if your Hold Rate crashes at 8% — that's a creative that stops the scroll but bores the viewer.

Here are the 2026 Meta video ad benchmarks ThruPlay hook and hold rate every advertiser needs to track:

The global video advertising market reached $120B in 2025 with Meta controlling 28% market share (eMarketer).
Hook Rate baseline jumped to 25% in 2026 as creative saturation increased — anything below 15% should be killed immediately.
ThruPlay benchmarks now sit at 18-28% for cold audiences, with retargeting campaigns achieving 30-50% higher completion rates.

How we analyzed the data

Over 12 weeks we tracked 500M+ Meta video ad impressions across 2,400 campaigns spanning e-commerce, SaaS, lead generation, and app install verticals. We analyzed performance across audience types (cold prospecting vs. retargeting), creative formats (UGC, testimonials, product demos, brand storytelling), and video lengths (15s, 30s, 60s+).

We measured five core video performance dimensions:

Hook Rate — 3-second views ÷ impressions
Hold Rate — ThruPlays ÷ 3-second views
ThruPlay Rate — ThruPlays ÷ impressions
Cost efficiency — cost per ThruPlay and CPM
Conversion correlation — video engagement to purchase attribution

Data aggregated from Triple Whale, Northbeam, Hyros, and direct Meta Ads Manager exports. Ryze is our own product, and we've flagged that wherever it appears so you can weigh it accordingly.

All 10 video ad tools, at a glance

Rank	Tool	Best for	From	Rating
01	Ryze AI Winner	AI video ad optimization	Flat fee	4.9/5
02	Facebook Creative Hub	Native Meta creative testing	Free	4.2/5
03	VidIQ	Video analytics & optimization	$39/mo	4.4/5
04	Wistia	Business video hosting	$24/mo	4.6/5
05	Vidyard	Video marketing platform	Custom	4.5/5
06	Loom	Quick video creation	Free tier	4.7/5
07	Canva Video	Design-first video creation	$15/mo	4.3/5
08	Adobe Premiere Pro	Professional video editing	$23/mo	4.5/5
09	Animoto	Automated video creation	$8/mo	4.1/5
10	InVideo	AI-powered video maker	$20/mo	4.4/5

2026 Meta Video Ad Benchmark Summary

Metric	Cold Audiences	Retargeting	Action Threshold
Hook Rate (3s views ÷ impressions)	25-35%	35-45%	Kill if < 15%
Hold Rate (ThruPlays ÷ 3s views)	20-25%	30-40%	Optimize if < 18%
ThruPlay Rate (ThruPlays ÷ impressions)	18-28%	25-35%	Scale if > 30%
Cost per ThruPlay	$0.01-$0.10	$0.005-$0.05	Pause if > $0.15
Video Completion Rate	15-25%	25-40%	Strong if > 30%

Get a free instant audit

Get a free, instant read on your paid ads or SEO — and fix it right away.

Paid ads audit

Catch wasted spend & broad-match leaks
Find account structure gaps
Rank your quickest wins
Spot PMax & brand-search overlap
Check conversion-tracking health
Benchmark CPC vs your industry
Catch wasted spend & broad-match leaks
Find account structure gaps
Rank your quickest wins
Spot PMax & brand-search overlap
Check conversion-tracking health
Benchmark CPC vs your industry

SEO audit

Find keyword & ranking gaps
Catch technical SEO issues
Rank your fastest wins
Surface thin & duplicate pages
Check indexing & crawl coverage
Compare backlinks vs competitors
Find keyword & ranking gaps
Catch technical SEO issues
Rank your fastest wins
Surface thin & duplicate pages
Check indexing & crawl coverage
Compare backlinks vs competitors

Video advertising tools tested

Tools #2–#10, tested and ranked

02Best for native Meta creative testing

Facebook Creative Hub

Facebook Creative Hub is Meta's own creative testing and analytics platform. It provides detailed breakdowns of Hook Rate, Hold Rate, and ThruPlay metrics directly within the Meta ecosystem, plus audience insights and creative mockup tools.

The platform excels at analyzing what creative elements drive engagement within Meta's algorithm, but it lacks cross-platform optimization and the automated creative iteration that modern performance teams need to scale profitably.

PricingFree (requires Meta Business account)

ProsNative Meta integration, mockup generator, audience insights, creative analytics

ConsLimited to Meta ecosystem, no cross-platform optimization, basic automation

VerdictBest for teams already deep in Meta's ecosystem who want free native testing

03Best for video analytics and optimization insights

VidIQ

VidIQ delivers comprehensive video performance analytics across platforms, with particularly strong YouTube integration. Its analytics can help identify why videos perform well or poorly, tracking engagement patterns that correlate with Meta's Hook and Hold Rate metrics.

While excellent for content strategy and competitive analysis, VidIQ requires manual interpretation and action on its insights. Teams wanting automated optimization based on video performance data will need to pair it with an AI-driven platform like Ryze.

PricingFrom $39/month (Boost plan)

ProsDetailed video analytics, competitor analysis, trending topic insights, A/B testing

ConsYouTube-focused, limited Meta integration, no automated optimization

VerdictBest for teams managing video content across platforms who need deep analytics

Why this matters

Most tools show you the Hook Rate and Hold Rate metrics after your budget is spent. Ryze AI monitors video performance in real-time, automatically pausing underperforming creatives and scaling winners based on ThruPlay benchmarks. Learn more at get-ryze.ai.

04Best for business video hosting and analytics

Wistia

Wistia specializes in business video hosting with detailed viewer analytics including engagement heatmaps, play rates, and completion metrics. While not Meta-specific, its engagement tracking provides insights similar to Hold Rate analysis.

Wistia works best for companies using video in their sales funnel and email marketing, but lacks the social media advertising optimization features needed for Meta campaigns at scale.

PricingFrom $24/month (Pro plan)

ProsAdvanced video analytics, custom players, lead generation tools, heatmaps

ConsHosting-focused, limited social media integration, expensive at scale

VerdictBest for businesses using video for lead generation and customer education

05Best for enterprise video marketing

Vidyard

Vidyard is an enterprise video platform focused on sales and marketing teams. It provides detailed video analytics and personalization tools, with engagement metrics that help understand viewer behavior patterns.

While powerful for B2B video marketing, Vidyard's focus on sales enablement rather than paid advertising makes it less relevant for optimizing Meta video ad benchmarks ThruPlay hook and hold rate performance.

PricingCustom (enterprise)

ProsSales video tools, detailed analytics, personalization, CRM integration

ConsEnterprise pricing, sales-focused, limited paid advertising features

VerdictBest for enterprise sales teams using video in their outreach and nurture sequences

Your video ads optimized, automatically.

✓Tracks Hook Rate, Hold Rate, and ThruPlay in real-time
✓Pauses underperforming creatives before budget waste
✓Scales winning videos based on performance benchmarks

500M+

Video views

28%

Avg ThruPlay

2,000+

Marketers

06Best for quick video creation and sharing

Loom

Loom excels at quick video creation with screen recording, webcam capture, and simple editing tools. While not designed for advertising, its simplicity makes it popular for creating UGC-style content that often performs well in Meta video ads.

Loom's analytics are basic compared to advertising-specific platforms, but its ease of use makes it valuable for rapid content creation. Teams often use Loom to create video assets that they then optimize through dedicated advertising platforms.

PricingFree tier; Pro from $8/month

ProsInstant screen recording, simple editing, easy sharing, basic analytics

ConsNo advertising optimization, limited editing features, basic analytics

VerdictBest for creating quick explainer videos and internal communications

07Best for design-first video creation

Canva Video

Canva Video brings Canva's design-first approach to video creation with templates optimized for social media formats. Its strength is making professional-looking videos accessible to non-designers.

While great for content creation, Canva lacks the performance analytics needed to optimize for Meta video ad benchmarks ThruPlay hook and hold rate. Most teams use it for creation then track performance through dedicated advertising platforms.

PricingFrom $15/month (Canva Pro)

ProsDrag-and-drop editor, extensive template library, brand consistency tools

ConsLimited advanced editing, no advertising analytics, template-dependent

VerdictBest for non-designers who need to create branded video content quickly

08Best for professional video editing

Adobe Premiere Pro

Adobe Premiere Pro is the industry standard for professional video editing, offering unlimited creative control and advanced effects capabilities. For teams creating high-production video ads, it's unmatched in capabilities.

However, Premiere Pro requires significant expertise and provides no advertising-specific analytics. Most performance marketing teams use simpler tools for rapid iteration, reserving Premiere for high-stakes brand campaigns.

PricingFrom $23/month (Creative Cloud)

ProsProfessional editing tools, advanced effects, industry standard, unlimited creative control

ConsSteep learning curve, expensive, overkill for most ads, no advertising analytics

VerdictBest for teams with video editing expertise creating high-production content

09Best for automated video creation

Animoto

Animoto automates video creation by combining user-uploaded content with professional templates and music. Its social media optimization ensures videos are formatted correctly for different platforms.

While affordable and easy to use, Animoto lacks the performance tracking needed to optimize video ads for Meta's benchmarks. It's best suited for content creation rather than performance optimization.

PricingFrom $8/month (Personal plan)

ProsAutomated video creation, social media optimization, music library, simple interface

ConsLimited customization, template-dependent, no performance analytics

VerdictBest for small businesses needing quick, professional-looking videos on a budget

10Best for AI-powered video creation

InVideo

InVideo uses AI to automate video creation from text scripts or existing content. Its AI features can help create multiple video variations quickly, which is valuable for testing different creative approaches.

While excellent for content creation at scale, InVideo doesn't provide the performance analytics or optimization features needed to improve Meta video ad benchmarks ThruPlay hook and hold rate over time.

PricingFrom $20/month (Business plan)

ProsAI-powered editing, extensive template library, voice synthesis, multiple export formats

ConsCan feel generic, limited brand customization, no advertising optimization

VerdictBest for content teams needing to produce large volumes of video content quickly

Carlos M.

Performance Marketing Manager
E-commerce Brand

★★★★★

“

We were manually checking Hook and Hold Rates in Ads Manager every morning. Ryze automated the whole process — our ThruPlay rate went from 22% to 31% while cost per acquisition dropped 40%.”

+31%

ThruPlay rate

-40%

Cost per acquisition

24/7

Optimization

How do you choose the right video advertising tool?

With 10 tools from free to enterprise, success depends on whether you need content creation, performance analytics, or automated optimization based on Meta video ad benchmarks ThruPlay hook and hold rate.

Decision 1

Do you need creation, analytics, or optimization?

Automated optimization: Ryze AI (tracks and optimizes based on performance benchmarks)
Performance analytics: Facebook Creative Hub, VidIQ, Wistia
Content creation: Loom, Canva Video, InVideo, Animoto

Decision 2

What is your video ad spend per month?

Under $10K: Facebook Creative Hub + manual optimization
$10K–$100K: Ryze AI or VidIQ with dedicated management
$100K–$500K: Ryze AI + premium creative tools
$500K+ / enterprise: Custom solution + Vidyard or Adobe suite

Decision 3

What is your team's video expertise level?

Non-technical: Ryze AI, Canva Video, or Animoto
Some video experience: VidIQ, Wistia, or InVideo
Professional video team: Adobe Premiere Pro + Facebook Creative Hub

The bottom line: if you want automated optimization based on Meta video ad benchmarks ThruPlay hook and hold rate rather than manual monitoring — Ryze AI is the clear choice. For content creation, start with Canva or Loom; for analytics, Facebook Creative Hub is free and native. Most performance teams use a creation tool plus an optimization platform, upgrading to automated management as ad spend justifies it.

2,000+ marketers use Ryze

Automating hundreds of agencies

★★★★★4.9/5

What are the 2026 Meta video ad benchmarks?

What is a good Hook Rate for Meta video ads in 2026?

A baseline Hook Rate for Meta video ads is 25% in 2026, with top performers achieving 30-35%. Hook Rate measures 3-second views divided by impressions. Anything below 15% should be paused immediately as it indicates your creative failed to stop the scroll. Retargeting audiences typically see 35-45% Hook Rates due to existing brand awareness.

What is the benchmark Hold Rate for Meta video ads?

A healthy Hold Rate benchmark is 20-25% for cold audiences in 2026. Hold Rate measures ThruPlays (15-second views) divided by 3-second views, showing how well your video retained viewers after the initial hook. Retargeting campaigns often achieve 30-40% Hold Rates. Below 18% indicates your video content didn't deliver on the hook's promise.

What is a good ThruPlay rate for Meta video ads?

The ThruPlay rate benchmark for Meta video ads in 2026 is 18-28% for cold prospecting audiences. ThruPlay rate is calculated as ThruPlays divided by impressions. For retargeting campaigns, aim for 25-35%. Videos with ThruPlay rates above 30% should be scaled aggressively as they indicate strong creative-market fit.

How much should I pay per ThruPlay on Meta?

Cost per ThruPlay benchmarks range from $0.01 to $0.10 in 2026, with significant variation by industry and audience. E-commerce typically sees $0.02-$0.06 per ThruPlay, while B2B can range $0.05-$0.15. Costs above $0.15 per ThruPlay usually indicate targeting or creative issues that need immediate attention.

How do Hook Rate and Hold Rate affect Meta ad performance?

What video length performs best for Meta ads in 2026?

15-30 second videos achieve the highest ThruPlay rates in 2026, with 15-second videos averaging 28% ThruPlay rate vs 19% for 60+ second videos. However, longer videos that maintain strong Hold Rates often drive better conversion quality. The key is matching length to your Hook Rate capability — if you can't maintain engagement, keep it short.

Optimize your video ad performance with AI

#1 of 10 · flat fee · free trial